nanog mailing list archives

RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC


From: "Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 11:26:02 +0000

For the sake of it, Justin, I just published https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-v6ops-yada-yatt/.
The first section of the draft (YADA) extends IPv4 range in an IPv4-only world. For some people that might be enough 
and I’m totally fine with that.

Keep safe;

Pascal

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+pthubert=cisco.com () nanog org> On Behalf Of Justin Streiner
Sent: dimanche 27 mars 2022 18:12
To: Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC

Abe:

To your first point about denying that anyone is being stopped from working on IPv4, I'm referring to users being able 
to communicate via IPv4.  I have seen no evidence of that.

I'm not familiar with the process of submitting ideas to IETF, so I'll leave that for others who are more knowledgeable 
on that to speak up if they're so inclined.

Thank you
jms

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 6:43 PM Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com<mailto:aychen () avinta com>> wrote:

1)    "... no one is stopping anyone from working on IPv4 ...     ":   After all these discussions, are you still 
denying this basic issue? For example, there has not been any straightforward way to introduce IPv4 enhancement ideas 
to IETF since at least 2015. If you know the way, please make it public. I am sure that many are eager to learn about 
it. Thanks.

Current thread: