nanog mailing list archives
Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:47:17 +0000
On 13 Apr 2022, at 5:16 AM, Alex Band <alex () nlnetlabs nl> wrote: In case people would like to compare notes to the way this is arranged in the RIPE NCC service region, here is the Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members policy which has been in place since 2013: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-596 This resulted in the implementation documented here: https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/rpki/resource-certification-rpki-for-provider-independent-end-users It essentially means that Provider Independent End Users and Legacy End Users can log into the RIPE NCC equivalent of ARIN Online and *only* manage RPKI, without having access to any other options.
Alex - Could you also include the definition of “legacy resource holders” in the RIPE region? In the ARIN region it’s quite clear – organizations (or their legal successors) who were part of the early Internet and obtained their number resources before ARIN’s formation are extended the courtesy of specific benefits for those number resources (i.e. basic registry services without any fee or contract and a favorable cap on total fees for those who bring their resources under registry agreement) As I understand it in the RIPE region, legacy number resources have little to do with parties that were issued them, and is instead some sort of magic property that is inherent to the address block itself and transfers along with the address block - is this correct? Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT), (continued)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 06)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran (Apr 07)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 07)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran (Apr 07)
- A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Doug Barton (Apr 12)
- Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption John Curran (Apr 12)
- Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Doug Barton (Apr 12)
- Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption William Herrin (Apr 13)
- Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Alex Band (Apr 13)
- Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Alex Band (Apr 13)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 06)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran (Apr 07)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 07)
- Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran (Apr 07)
- Re: [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 Jon Lewis (Apr 04)
- Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 John Curran (Apr 04)
- Re: [nanog] Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Dan Mahoney (Gushi) (Apr 04)
- Re: [nanog] [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - John Curran (Apr 04)
- Re: [nanog] Re: [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Dan Mahoney (Gushi) (Apr 04)