nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Jared Brown <nanog-isp () mail com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 15:03:06 +0200
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
If I'm a gamer, and one of my possible ISPs is using CGN, and from time to time stops working, and another ISP is providing me a public and/or static IPv4 address, always working, and there is not too much price difference, what I will do?
Changing providers only works in a competitive market, but even there a little bit of market segmentation isn't necessarily a bad thing. The main thing is that ISPs should not be so accommodating to these malfeasants, who via their practices make a bad situation worse. Sony et al. are externalizing costs and that shouldn't be accepted. - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 05)
- Re: V6 still not supported Francis Booth via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Greco (Apr 04)
- Re: antique CGN complaints, was V6 still not supported John Levine (Apr 04)
- Re: antique CGN complaints, was V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 05)
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Apr 05)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Apr 05)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Apr 05)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jose Luis Rodriguez (Apr 05)
- Re: V6 still not supported Mark Andrews (Apr 06)