Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

[Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>]

> On 29 Sep 2021, at 05:02, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
>
> > Heh, NAT is not that evil after all. Do you expect that all the home
> > people will get routable public IPs for all they toys inside house?
>
> in ipv6 they can.  and it can have consequences, see
>
>    NATting Else Matters: Evaluating IPv6 Access Control Policies in
>    Residential Networks; 
>    Karl Olson, Jack Wampler, Fan Shen, and Nolen Scaife
>
>    https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-72582-2_22.pdf
>
> the ietf did not give guidance to cpe vendors to protect toys inside
> your LAN

Really?

RFC6092                                         January 2011

        Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in
        Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) for
        Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6092

CableLabs has similar requirements.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka () isc org