![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:46:46 -0700
There are real issues with dual-stack, as this thread started out with. I don't think there is a need neither to invent IPv6 problems, nor to promote IPv6 advantages. What we need is a way out of dual-stack-hell.
I don’t disagree, but a reversion to IPv4-only certainly won’t do it. I think the only way out is through. Unfortunately, the IPv6 resistant forces are making that hard for everyone else. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Colton Conor (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eric Kuhnke (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Joe Maimon (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Joe Maimon (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC borg (Sep 24)