nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:53:28 -0700
On Sep 18, 2021, at 13:25 , John R. Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:As you noted John, its the plethora of software, support systems, tooling, and most important in many environments - legacy customer management and provisioning systems that can be the limiting factor. ...Just looking around my office, I have a Cisco SPA112 two-port ATA. It's been discontinued but Cisco says they will support it through 2025 and they shipped a firmware update in 2019. It works fine on IPv4 behind a NAT. It has no v6 support at all and never will. Multiply that by a zillion and you can see that IPv4 isn't going away any time soon.
This isn’t about removing IPv4 from every last corner of the internet. It’s about adding IPv6 to the content providers that are blocking the ability to build new eyeball networks v6 only. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jared Mauch (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Stephen Satchell (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 20)