nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:54:48 +0200
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> writes:
All this is resolved using IPv6-only and IPv4aaS, the same way as cellular providers are doing with 464XLAT.
Sure, there are a gazillion ways to provde edge access to both IPv4 and IPv6. You can pick anyone you like. But the extra layers still do not come for free. And cellular providers give you a single /64. Not even useful as IPv6 access for anything larger than a single handset. Extending that /64 to something you can use is non-trivial. How many providers have actually done that? And how many end users cared? Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)