nanog mailing list archives
Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 23:10:43 +0200
On 10/1/21 19:28, Randy Bush wrote:
in fact, this seems to be the modern conservative style for some years. i sometimes wonder if it is worth the config pain.
If having routers dedicated to peering, transit or edge functions is worth the extra pain, in lieu of doing it all on one box?
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Randy Bush (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Adam Thompson (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Saku Ytti (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Adam Thompson (Oct 01)