nanog mailing list archives
Re: Questions about IRR best practices
From: George Michaelson <ggm () algebras org>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 10:55:32 +1000
Wouldn't it be cool if we had a cryptographic mechanism to sign an authority to the IRR publisher to eject old data. Some way you could prove you have control of the asset, and the let the RADB people know you repudiated some old data, made under somebody else's authority which you can't remove directly, even though it's probably stale. Something like a PKI tagged with your addresses and/or ASN. G On Sat, 13 Nov 2021, 10:41 am Jay Hennigan, <jay () west net> wrote:
Tagging onto this thread as it's relevant to me. Is there any mechanism for removing stale cruft that someone else has added to IRR? Two of our subnets have some cruft from an automated script that was accurate in 2006 when they were created, but are no longer valid. Long story short, we consolidated acquisitions into a single AS, returned the old AS to ARIN, and a 2006 RADB entry that looks to have been auto-generated by Level 3 with the old AS is still hanging around, causing other to question it. -- Jay Hennigan - jay () west net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
Current thread:
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Adam Korab (Nov 12)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Jay Hennigan (Nov 12)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices George Michaelson (Nov 12)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Rubens Kuhl (Nov 12)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices George Michaelson (Nov 12)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices George Michaelson (Nov 12)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Jay Hennigan (Nov 12)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Adam Korab (Nov 12)