nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 11:06:26 -0800
On Nov 27, 2021, at 19:37 , Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote: Mark Tinka wrote:On 11/27/21 17:07, Masataka Ohta wrote:Because lengthy IPv6 addresses mean a lot more opex than IPv4.I disagreeTry to type in raw IPv6 addresses.
Rarely necessary in the modern age, but really not significantly more difficult than IPv4 once you become accustomed to it. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Bell (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)