RE: IPv6 and CDN's

[Jean St-Laurent via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

With a kicking ass pitch

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org> On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: November 26, 2021 5:52 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: IPv6 and CDN's



On 11/3/21 22:13, Max Tulyev wrote:

> Implementing IPv6 reduces costs for CGNAT. You will have (twice?) less 
> traffic flow through CGNAT, so cheaper hardware and less IPv4 address 
> space. Isn't it?

How to express that in numbers CFO can take to the bank?

Mark.