nanog mailing list archives
Re: fun with TLDs and captive portals was, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 23 Nov 2021 21:28:51 -0500
It appears that Francis Booth via NANOG <boothf () boothlabs me> said:
So we know RFC 2606 defined reserved TLDs like .lan and .home so there
Um, this must be a different RFC 2606 than the one the rest of us have read. It mentions neither .lan nor .home.
In order to solve the chicken/egg problem of having to know your IPv6 prefix and the address assigned to your router dynamically for nontechnical users to reach their router configuration pages, ...
SLAAC lets hosts find their prefix and router and optionally other stuff like the DNS servers. See RFC4862. This is a thoroughly solved problem. If your router is a captive portal like at a coffee shop and client devices need to open a web page to log in, see RFC 8910. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public, (continued)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson (Nov 21)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin (Nov 21)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matthew Walster (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Francis Booth via NANOG (Nov 23)
- Re: fun with TLDs and captive portals was, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Levine (Nov 23)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Chris Adams (Nov 20)
- Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Michael Thomas (Nov 20)
- Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jim (Nov 20)
- Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin (Nov 20)
- Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Michael Thomas (Nov 20)
- Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin (Nov 20)
- Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Michael Thomas (Nov 20)