nanog mailing list archives
Re: Flowspec IPv6
From: Eric Dugas via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:54:23 -0400
Turns out the apply-group isn't working for v6 rules. ATAC made me replicate the same rule directly under routing-options and inet6flow.0 appeared and I can see my rule populated now. FYI I'm running vRR 20.4R1-S1.2 On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 4:55 AM Zbyněk Pospíchal <zbynek () dialtelecom cz> wrote:
Hi Eric, with no v6 fs rules, the table inet6flow.0 stay hidden. Try to make any. -- S pozdravem/Best Regards, Zbyněk Dne 21.05.21 v 20:10 Eric Dugas via NANOG napsal(a):Hello, I've been fiddling with JunOS to enable Flowspec IPv6. According to the docs, it was implemented in 16.x. I've tried to set it up in vRR and vMX in the 20.x train. Everything commit just fine, I get the inetflow.0 for IPv4 but inet6flow.0 is not appearing. I already have a JTAC case (now escalated to ATAC) but I am looking for plan B. Has anyone implemented Flowspec v6? I was thinking about FRRouting but I wanted to get some feedback from the community before spending more hours into this. Thanks Eric
Current thread:
- Flowspec IPv6 Eric Dugas via NANOG (May 21)
- Re: Flowspec IPv6 Zbyněk Pospíchal (May 23)
- Re: Flowspec IPv6 Eric Dugas via NANOG (May 26)
- Re: Flowspec IPv6 Trond Hastad via NANOG (May 23)
- Re: Flowspec IPv6 Zbyněk Pospíchal (May 23)