nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:18:17 -0400
why not confine the effort to the one need that seems to clearly exist: a place for network engineers to solicit vendors of the goods and services that network engineers buy?
If there's a real need for that ( which my voicemail and email might say is debatable :) ) , then someone could start that, but I do not think NANOG itself should. Biz-dev is not the stated mission of the organization. On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:52 PM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 8:56 AM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:That seems like a reasonable proposal. NANOG-OffTopic, NANOG-Discuss,NANOG-BizDev, NANOG-xyz, something (more more than one something). Hi Mike, This conversation started because someone got called to carpet for soliciting a vendor on the main list. Rather than guessing at how to split up topics, why not confine the effort to the one need that seems to clearly exist: a place for network engineers to solicit vendors of the goods and services that network engineers buy? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Mercer (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Karl Auer (Mar 22)
- Re: [External] Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? John Levine (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Michael Hallgren (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Joe Provo (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Mercer (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? bzs (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? William Herrin (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Tom Beecher (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 19)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Niels Bakker (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Valdis Klētnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? John Sage (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Tom Beecher (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Brielle (Mar 20)