nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: "james.cutler () consultant com" <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 19:18:43 -0400
Perhaps this discussion should return to topic (communicating between humans with common interests over extremely diverse languages and environments). Facilitating communication with hardware should be a discussed as a separate topic. Jim - Deliberately posted on top.
On Mar 21, 2021, at 1:22 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:...not to mention that all mature networks are moving more towards GUI front ends for their automated network. As the complexity of a network increases, CLI access becomes considerably more risky. The idea that "real engineers use the CLI" is dinosaur thinking that will eventually land those with that philosophy out of a job. Just my personal $.02 (though I'm certainly not alone in my opinion).real engineers write code to do it. and gooeys get in the way something awful. remember cascade?
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Emil Pfeffer (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Valdis Klētnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Robert Brockway (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Randy Bush (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 21)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Sabri Berisha (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Alain Hebert (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Tom Beecher (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Shawn L via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Randy Bush (Mar 20)