nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 09:49:44 -0500
support () peeringdb com is fairly prominently displayed at the bottom of every page that peeringdb displays..... On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:16 PM Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com> wrote:
First, take a look at this: https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools): https://bgp.he.net/AS18894 https://stat.ripe.net/18894 The claimed prefixes announced, traffic levels and POPs appear to have no correlation with reality in global v4/v6 BGP tables. It is also noteworthy that I have inquired with a number of persons I know who are active in network engineering in NYC, and nobody has ever encountered this company.
Current thread:
- Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Eric Kuhnke (Mar 04)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Tom Beecher (Mar 05)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Stefan Funke (Mar 05)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Justin Wilson (Lists) (Mar 05)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? James Breeden (Mar 08)