nanog mailing list archives
Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections
From: Jared Brown <nanog-isp () mail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:46:10 +0200
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 Mike Hammet wrote:
Why 100/100?
Because subsidies should only be used for long term solutions. The definition of broadband is mainly relevant to determine who should receive subsidies. Commercial broadband has already far surpassed the minimums. - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections, (continued)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Josh Luthman (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Christopher Morrow (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jun 03)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Hammett (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Cory Sell via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Hammett (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Hammett (Jun 02)