nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS
From: Alex Conner via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:00:30 -0400
Yep; but even IP Passthrough, routed subnet, etc. all count as NAT sessions against the internal NAT table. BTW, that's the feature you're looking for - routed subnet. That will pass your /26 to another network device over an RFC1918 subnet. The steps depend on what particular gateway hardware they have, but a quick Google of the gateway model and "routed subnet" should get you to the right spot. Assuming of course the other service limitations aren't a dealbreaker. On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:54 PM Dennis Burgess <dmburgess () linktechs net> wrote:
Ya not wishing to do NAT... Sent from mobile device.. ------------------------------ *From:* Alex Conner <hello () codatory com> *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2021 1:49:27 PM *To:* TJ Trout <tj () pcguys us> *Cc:* Dennis Burgess <dmburgess () linktechs net>; nanog () nanog org < nanog () nanog org> *Subject:* Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Bonus points, the small business fiber has extremely limited NAT session limits (depends on hardware, but not greater than 16,000 sessions) and *everything *counts. Cold loading CNN.com (an AT&T company) in a default config without an adblocker will use close to 3000, which will saturate and cause errors on some of their gateway hardware (NVG595). If you want to use it for any serious purpose, stick a tunnel out to a real connection. On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:43 PM TJ Trout <tj () pcguys us> wrote: Yeah not going to happen on U-verse On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:32 AM Dennis Burgess <dmburgess () linktechs net> wrote: Guess their broadband stuff☹ *[image: LTI-Full_175px]* *Dennis Burgess* Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com Need MikroTik Cloud Management: https://cloud.linktechs.net *From:* TJ Trout <tj () pcguys us> *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2021 1:12 PM *To:* Dennis Burgess <dmburgess () linktechs net> *Cc:* nanog () nanog org *Subject:* Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS call back, i dont think that's accurate. What is the specific product? On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 7:25 AM Dennis Burgess <dmburgess () linktechs net> wrote: I have a ATT fiber line for a customer that has a 300/300 circuit, but its not a MIS they are telling me we cannot route a /26 (they have allocated) to my device behind it. ☹ Any options? *Dennis Burgess* * Mikrotik : **Trainer, Network Associate, Routing Engineer, Wireless Engineer, Traffic Control Engineer, Inter-Networking Engineer, Security Engineer, Enterprise Wireless Engineer* *Hurricane Electric: **IPv6 Sage Level* *Cambium: **ePMP* Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com Need MikroTik Cloud Management: https://cloud.linktechs.net *How did we do today?* <https://app.customerthermometer.com/?template=log_feedback&hash=5badbac1&embed_data=dGVtcGVyYXR1cmVfaWQ9MSZ0aGVybW9tZXRlcl9pZD0xMTM1NjYmbnBzX3JhdGluZz0tMQ==&e=Anonymous&f=Dennis&l=Burgess&c=&c1=&c2=&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c7=&c8=&c9=&c10=>
Current thread:
- AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Dennis Burgess (Jun 10)
- Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS TJ Trout (Jun 10)
- RE: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Dennis Burgess (Jun 10)
- Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS TJ Trout (Jun 10)
- Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Alex Conner via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Dennis Burgess (Jun 10)
- Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Alex Conner via NANOG (Jun 10)
- RE: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Dennis Burgess (Jun 10)
- RE: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS Dennis Burgess (Jun 10)
- Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS TJ Trout (Jun 10)