nanog mailing list archives
Re: [External] Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation
From: Hunter Fuller via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:32:05 -0500
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:37 AM Jörg Kost <jk () ip-clear de> wrote:
I understand; my thinking, let's keep the diversity up for everyone's benefit. While Commscope is not producing ethernet switches only, from sales and numbers of employees, they are a massive mothership of communication technology.
I agree, and I love Ruckus switches. But if they intend to maintain a customer base in this market, they should maintain a competent and at least minimally helpful/knowledgeable TAC for their switches. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1A +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering
Current thread:
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation, (continued)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Saku Ytti (Jul 22)
- RE: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Adam Thompson (Jul 22)
- RE: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Tony Wicks (Jul 22)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Saku Ytti (Jul 22)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Jörg Kost (Jul 22)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Adam Thompson (Jul 22)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jul 23)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Randy Bush (Jul 23)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jul 24)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jul 24)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Jörg Kost (Jul 23)
- Re: [External] Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Jul 23)
- Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation Will Essary (Jul 23)