nanog mailing list archives
100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues
From: Graham Johnston <johnston.grahamj () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:28:16 -0500
Good day, Over the last two years, organizations that I've worked with have upgraded equipment and now make regular use of 100G port speeds. To provide a frame of reference on use cases, the organizations that I've worked for make use of 100G speeds within their own data centers, in carrier neutral data centers, and lease 100G transport from larger carriers; they don't currently operate their own 100G coherent/long-haul networks. - How commonly do other operators experience input errors with 100G interfaces? - How often do you find that you have to change a transceiver out? Either for errors or another reason. - Do we collectively expect this to improve as 100G becomes more common and production volumes increase in the future? Thanks, Graham
Current thread:
- 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Graham Johnston (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Saku Ytti (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Graham Johnston (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Saku Ytti (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Jared Mauch (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Graham Johnston (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Baldur Norddahl (Jul 20)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Graham Johnston (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Saku Ytti (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Stonebraker, Jack J (Jul 19)
- Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE (Jul 20)
- RE: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues Kevin Menzel via NANOG (Jul 20)