nanog mailing list archives
Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Half Fibre Pair
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:28:48 +0200
On 1/27/21 18:11, Rod Beck wrote:
What is interesting is this new deep sea design. In the old days cables had 4 to 8 pairs max. Now I am seeing Orange talking about 18 pairs and 24 pairs. With more widely regeneration.
Because of the way current submarine cables are being built (mainly by the content folk, less by traditional telco's), limiting the number of fibre pairs does not make sense anymore, especially for them since they would be partnering with some carriers along the route.
I mean, you're already laying it. Fibre, itself, doesn't cost that much... the cost is elsewhere.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Half Fibre Pair, (continued)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Ben Cannon (Jan 26)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 26)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Ask Bjørn Hansen (Jan 26)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Mark Tinka (Jan 27)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Rod Beck (Jan 27)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Mark Tinka (Jan 27)
- RE: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Half Fibre Pair Fox, Barbara via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Half Fibre Pair Rod Beck (Jan 27)
- Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Half Fibre Pair Mike Hammett (Jan 27)
- Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Half Fibre Pair Mark Tinka (Jan 27)
- Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Half Fibre Pair Mark Tinka (Jan 27)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Rod Beck (Jan 27)
- Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Half Fibre Pair Mark Tinka (Jan 27)
- Re: Half Fibre Pair Ben Cannon (Jan 26)