nanog mailing list archives
Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:34:25 -0800
fyi, i was contacted by a clue holder from protonmail. my guess was correct. they pointed me to the wkd section of https://protonmail.com/blog/security-updates-2019/ as i responded to them: i am definitely wondering how well it scales. it adds query burden, often toward a server different than the smtp target. e.g. the wkd server could have sucky performance. randy
Current thread:
- opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Randy Bush (Jan 15)
- Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Brian J. Murrell (Jan 15)
- Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Bryan Fields (Jan 15)
- Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Brian J. Murrell (Jan 15)
- Re: tiny gorillas, was opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) John Levine (Jan 15)
- Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Bryan Fields (Jan 15)
- Message not available
- Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Randy Bush (Jan 15)
- Re: opportunistic email encryption by the MTA (not MUA) Brian J. Murrell (Jan 15)