nanog mailing list archives
Re: DMVPN via Internet or Private APN
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:06:16 +0200
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 18:57, Sean Kelly <kellysp () gmail com> wrote:
The real debate arrives when it's time to choose a carrier to host the router. I choose to go with a major cell carrier using a "private"
I'm not sure I see the sides of the debate. I personally see no utility at all in paying premium for APN, I see it as a way to pay a premium to get liability. There are no improvements in security posture but obviously if there is APN specific outage, outage in your APN is not going to be much of a priority compared to outage at consumer APN, which is fire drill. As well as you make it a lot harder to procure and negotiate, particularly if you expand to new markets. Compared to dial-home DMVPN where you have no requirements above most standard INET access offered. I assume you mean DMVPN with IPSEC. If you don't imply IPSEC, then I assume security wasn't a metric for this product. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- DMVPN via Internet or Private APN Sean Kelly (Jan 12)
- Re: DMVPN via Internet or Private APN Saku Ytti (Jan 12)
- Re: [External] DMVPN via Internet or Private APN Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Jan 12)
- Re: DMVPN via Internet or Private APN Chriztoffer Hansen (Jan 12)
- Re: DMVPN via Internet or Private APN William Herrin (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DMVPN via Internet or Private APN Joel M Snyder (Jan 13)