nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 01:18:40 +0000
ROTFL! I’m sorry, but the imagery of people paying rent for a piece of Randy’s mind is just too much :)
On Jan 21, 2021, at 14:22 , Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:I’m sure we all remember Y2k (well, most of us, there could be some young-uns on the list). That day was happening whether we wanted it to or not. It was an unchangeable, unmovable deadline.but i thought 3gpp was gong to force ipv6 adoptionlet me try it a different way why should i care whether you deploy ipv6, move to dual stack, cgnat, ...? you will do whatever makes sense to the pointy heads in your c suite. why should i give them or some tech religion free rent in my mind when i already have too much real work to do?
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Feb 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 09)