nanog mailing list archives
Re: CGNAT
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:07:30 +0100
IPv4 as a Service such as 464XLAT, will allow them to use less IPv4 public addresses than CGNAT, less costly equipment (or open source) and still provide dual-stack inside the customers networks. There is nothing from Internet that will not work. I’ve many deployments based on this, and this is the transition mechanism that have more millions of customers, even if compared with all the others together. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 19/2/21 21:15, "NANOG en nombre de Tony Wicks" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es () nanog org en nombre de tony () wicks co nz> escribió: Because then a large part of the Internet won't work.... From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+tony=wicks.co.nz () nanog org> on behalf of Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> Sent: Saturday, 20 February 2021, 9:04 am To: Steve Saner Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: CGNAT Why not go whole hog and provide IPv4 as a service? That way you are not waiting for your customers to turn up IPv6 to take the load off your NAT box. Yes, you can do it dual stack but you have waited so long you may as well miss that step along the deployment path. -- Mark Andrews On 20 Feb 2021, at 01:55, Steve Saner <ssaner () ideatek com> wrote: We are starting to look at CGNAT solutions. The primary motivation at the moment is to extend current IPv4 resources, but IPv6 migration is also a factor. We've been in touch with A10. Just wondering if there are some alternative vendors that anyone would recommend. We'd probably be looking at a solution to support 5k to 15k customers and bandwidth up to around 30-40 gig as a starting point. A solution that is as transparent to user experience as possible is a priority. Thanks -- Steve Saner ideatek HUMAN AT OUR VERY FIBER This email transmission, and any documents, files or previous email messages attached to it may contain confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not, or believe you may not be, the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by return email or by calling 620.543.5026. Then take all steps necessary to permanently delete the email and all attachments from your computer system. ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Current thread:
- Re: CGNAT, (continued)
- Re: CGNAT Owen DeLong (Feb 21)
- RE: CGNAT nanog () jima us (Feb 22)
- Re: CGNAT Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 23)
- Re: CGNAT JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Feb 23)
- DualStack (CGNAT) vs Other Transition methods Douglas Fischer (Feb 24)
- Re: DualStack (CGNAT) vs Other Transition methods Ca By (Feb 24)
- Re: DualStack (CGNAT) vs Other Transition methods Douglas Fischer (Feb 24)
- Re: DualStack (CGNAT) vs Other Transition methods Mark Andrews (Feb 24)
- RE: CGNAT nanog () jima us (Feb 22)
- Re: DualStack (CGNAT) vs Other Transition methods JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Feb 24)
- Re: CGNAT Owen DeLong (Feb 21)