nanog mailing list archives

Re: Log4j mitigation

From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () interall co il>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:07:15 +0200

On 13/12/2021 15:28, bofh139 wrote:

Now we have the long journey from Java, Ldap, DNS, Birds and Coffee Cups

behind us. Does anyone else have any advice on prevention?


Scan your systems:
https://github.com/logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner
https://github.com/fullhunt/log4j-scan

-Hank

Current thread:

RE: Log4j mitigation, (continued)
- - - RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Karl Auer (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation bofh139 (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Hank Nussbacher (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Karl Auer (Dec 13)
    - RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation A Crisan (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Mike Hammett (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Karl Auer (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Andy Ringsmuth (Dec 13)
  - Re: Log4j mitigation Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 13)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Doug McIntyre (Dec 14)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Tyler Conrad (Dec 14)
    - Re: Log4j mitigation Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 14)

(Thread continues...)