nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse Contact Handling
From: Matt Corallo <nanog () as397444 net>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:44:43 -0400
There's a few old threads on this from last year or so, but while unmonitored abuse contacts are terrible, similarly, people have installed automated abuse contact spammer systems which is equally terrible. Thus, lots of the large hosting providers have deemed the cost of actually putting a human on an abuse contact is much too high.
I'm not sure what the answer is here, but I totally get why large providers just say "we can better protect a web form with a captcha than an email box, go use that if there's real abuse".
Matt On 8/5/21 09:14, Mike Hammett wrote:
What does the greater operator community think of RIR abuse contacts that are unmonitored autoresponders? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
Current thread:
- Abuse Contact Handling Mike Hammett (Aug 05)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 05)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Matt Corallo (Aug 05)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 05)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Randy Bush (Aug 05)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling goemon--- via NANOG (Aug 05)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling richey goldberg (Aug 06)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Mike Hammett (Aug 06)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Matt Corallo (Aug 06)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Mike Hammett (Aug 06)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 06)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Tom Beecher (Aug 06)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 06)
- Re: Abuse Contact Handling JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 05)