nanog mailing list archives
Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP
From: Scott Morizot <tmorizot () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:43:14 -0500
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:19 PM John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote:
I provide all of the above in the spirit of maximal transparency, but there are indeed some practical limits to what can be provided. The community should know that there was no special deal – only a clarification that the USG sought that was both appropriate under the circumstances and comparable to our handling other organizations that wished to move address space around internally.
Thanks for that expanded clarification about the DoD agreement, John. I'll note that although my agency did not go so far as an additional signed agreement, we did confirm we retained the ability to move portions of our IPv4 networks, including networks we had not previously used publicly, as required to contracted services acting on our behalf or other bureaus in our department as operationally needed. I understand the DoD desire for clarification. Thanks again, Scott
Current thread:
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP cosmo (Apr 25)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Mike Hammett (Apr 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP William Herrin (Apr 25)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Bryan Fields (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Scott Morizot (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP John Curran (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP John Curran (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Scott Morizot (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP John Curran (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Scott Morizot (Apr 26)