nanog mailing list archives

Re: Trident3 vs Jericho2


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 08:04:02 -0500 (CDT)

What I've observed is that it's better to have a big buffer device when you're mixing port speeds. The more dramatic 
the port speed differences (and the more of them), the more buffer you need. 


If you have all the same port speed, small buffers are fine. If you have 100G and 1G ports, you'll need big buffers 
wherever the transition to the smaller port speed is located. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Dmitry Sherman" <dmitry () interhost net> 
To: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 7:57:05 AM 
Subject: Trident3 vs Jericho2 

Once again, which is better shared buffer featurerich or fat buffer switches? 
When its better to put big buffer switch? When its better to drop and retransmit instead of queueing? 

Thanks. 
Dmitry 


Current thread: