nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent emails
From: Dovid Bender <dovid () telecurve com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:13:41 -0400
The question is if they are back to contacting the names on whois or they magically found our emails "another way" and they have plausible deniability. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 PM David Guo <david () xtom com> wrote:
Yes, every week Proof https://vip1.loli.net/2020/09/15/bq3lHGuvNRkW9YS.jpg *From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces+david=xtom.com () nanog org> * On Behalf Of *Dovid Bender *Sent:* Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:46 AM *To:* NANOG <nanog () nanog org> *Subject:* Cogent emails Is anyone starting to get the "cogent emails" again?
Current thread:
- Cogent emails Dovid Bender (Sep 14)
- RE: Cogent emails David Guo via NANOG (Sep 14)
- SPAM: Re: Cogent emails Simon Lockhart (Sep 14)
- Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails Mike Lyon (Sep 14)
- Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails Mike Hammett (Sep 14)
- Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails Tom Hill (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Dovid Bender (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Jesse DuPont (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Ryan Wilkins (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Daniel Corbe (Sep 16)
- SPAM: Re: Cogent emails Simon Lockhart (Sep 14)
- RE: Cogent emails David Guo via NANOG (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 21)
- Re: Cogent emails Rich Kulawiec (Sep 22)
- Re: Cogent emails J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: Cogent emails Rich Kulawiec (Sep 22)