Re: Cogent Layer 2

[James Jun <james.jun () towardex com>]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:54:49AM -0700, Ryan Hamel wrote:
> One would think that with 100GE interfaces, it would not be possible to overrun the interface if we allowed full 
> 10Gbps/flow, however most 100GE interfaces, at the chip level are broken down into 10Gbps lanes and the interfaces do 
> not have a way to easily determine that a lane through the interface is at capacity, so as new flows enter the 
> interface, they could get allocated to a lane that is already full and therefore experience packet loss.

This does raise an interesting point regarding ASR9K platform.  IIRC, older Typhoon/NP4c 100GE cards (e.g. Juggernaut 
A9K-2X100GE-TR) had problems where on a 100GE port, you can't sustain more than 10-12 Gbps per individual flow.  You 
had to hash to achieve aggregate bandwidth, which became a significant issue if you were trying to transport 10G L2 
pseudowires with limited flow visibility.

I'm not aware that it is an issue any longer on newer Tomahawk/NP5c cards?

James