nanog mailing list archives
Re: Technology risk without safeguards
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:19:12 -0800
The fact that we haven't been able to identify a factual relationship, does not mean that there isn't any.
just wow and, for all we know, the back side of the moon is green cheese
Current thread:
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards, (continued)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Matt Harris (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Tom Beecher (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards nanog08 (Nov 04)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 04)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Max Harmony (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Tom Beecher (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Rich Kulawiec (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 06)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Jon Sands (Nov 10)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 10)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 10)