![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Technology risk without safeguards
From: Suresh Kalkunte <sskalkunte () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 07:05:42 +0530
Since I value the health and well being of my fellow netwotking professionals who exercise good judgment, I express the following. If not anything else, if you have got the feedback from a leading law enforcement/military practioner (I scarcely believe the Judiciary would even condider my suggestion if this concern for status quo of lawlessness was based on flimsy ground as you make it out to be - https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/archives/suggestions/suresh-kalkunte-16-cv-g) like I have and they say this path of enquiry is based on falsehood, go ahead, call it a conspiracy. When you agreed in an earlier post that research was required, it conveyed rational reasoning, but not this. I am no George Washington (because I have not experienced the hardship he endured/saw or enjoyed the loyalty of Brave souls who breathed liberty), but, this line of maligning reminds me of the false allegation made against His Excellency Washington that he was in league with the adversary in an effort to sow distrust just before the end of the first American Revolution. On Wednesday, November 11, 2020, Sabri Berisha <sabri () cluecentral net> wrote:
----- On Nov 10, 2020, at 12:56 AM, Jon Sands fohdeesha () gmail com wrote:On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 8:00 PM Suresh Kalkunte < [ mailto:sskalkunte () gmail com |sskalkunte () gmail com ] > wrote:raw garlic assimilationThis thread is definitely going to be used in a future court caseNah, by that time this thread will be classified as an internet conspiracy :) If anyone should look at this thread for the purposes of bringing it in as evidence in any type of legal action: keep in mind that few (if any) of the contributors are medical or legal professionals, and some may be simple trolls. Nothing in this thread has any evidentiary contribution and represents the personal opinion of the writers. Scientific studies should be preferred over this type of 'internet folklore'. We're network plumbers. Thanks, Sabri, certified plumber.
Current thread:
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards, (continued)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Tom Beecher (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Rich Kulawiec (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 06)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Jon Sands (Nov 10)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 10)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 10)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 10)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)