nanog mailing list archives
Re: McAfee's certificate on akamai seems to be invalid
From: Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 13:14:00 -0400
On 5/7/20 12:16 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
It looks like you shouldn't attempt to access that site over HTTPS, just via plain HTTP. Do you have any official bit of documentation that links to the HTTPS version?
Given the prevalence of opportunistic upgrades to TLS these days, I'd argue that having a misbehaving server listing on 443 (and accepting SNI for a name that works on plain HTTP, if applicable) at the same domain as a well-known, public HTTP server, especially from a "security" company, is a poor idea.
-- Brandon Martin
Current thread:
- McAfee's certificate on akamai seems to be invalid Drew Weaver (May 07)
- Re: McAfee's certificate on akamai seems to be invalid Niels Bakker (May 07)
- Re: McAfee's certificate on akamai seems to be invalid Brandon Martin (May 07)
- Re: McAfee's certificate on akamai seems to be invalid Niels Bakker (May 07)