nanog mailing list archives

Rate-limiting BCOP?


From: Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 21:08:28 +0200

I'm curious if the community would be willing to share their best-practices and/or recommendations and thoughts on how they handle situations where a customer buys X amount of bandwidth, but the physical link is capable of Y, where Y > X. (Yes, I speak of policy-maps, tx/rx-queues, etc.)

For example, it might be arguably common to aggregate customer links Layer 2, and then push them upstream to where they anchor Layer 3. That Layer 2 <-> Layer 3 could be a couple of meters or several kilometers.

So, as I see it, my options are:

* Rate-limit at the Layer 2 switch for both customer ingress/egress,

* Rate-limit at the Layer 3 router upstream, i/e, or

* Some combination thereof? E.g.: Rate-limit my traffic towards the customer closer to the core, and rate-limit ingress closer to the edge?

I've done all three on some level in my travels, but in the past it's also been oftentimes vendor-centric which hindered a scalable or "templateable" solution. (Some things police in only one direction, or only well in one direction, etc.)

In case someone is interested in a tangible example, imagine an Arista switch and an ASR9k router. :)

Thoughts?


Current thread: