nanog mailing list archives
Re: alternative to voip gateways
From: Nick Edwards <nick.z.edwards () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:56:37 +1000
yes, POTS is the critical bit, the internet/data is an extra without guarantee, ie it is not a critical component, voice is. On 5/10/20, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Nick Have you considered using CPE DSL routers with VoIP and FXP analog out? Decentralized. That's what everyone are doing here. Might be free depending on where you get the CPEs. Or simply getting VoIP handsets. Lots of cheap DECT bases with VoIP. Regards Baldur søn. 10. maj 2020 14.51 skrev Nick Edwards <nick.z.edwards () gmail com>:On 5/8/20, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:14 AM Masataka Ohta < mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:Investment for FTTH is 10 times or more than that for plain DSL.We are assuming the copper plant is already there otherwise I will respectfully disagree. However the economic is not as simple as you might think. Lets do some calculations. Assume we can build the fiber plant for 1 million USD (*). This fiber can be depreciated over 25 years. That means we only take USD 40,000/year of the company profit. The copper plant is already there but the DSLAM is missing. Assume USD100per port plus USD 100 per DSL CPE. This equipment can only be depreciated over 5 years. With 1700 ports this gives USD 68,000/year of the company profit.a 48 port dslam is 2200 (still awaiting cots on line cards for above mentioned chassis) so its about 45 per port, CPE is about 50 a device in bulk (inc 4 gb ports, wifi) The copper exists, there is no ripping it out Due to location RF links are used for data, so no need to give each cabin "future proof" since unless a carrier will run fibre to us for 100's miles at their cost - it just aint happenin, the cost is extremely prohibitive.Not claiming these number are anything but fantasy as I know nothingaboutthe layout of the project. Just illustrating that sometimes more moneynowdoes not necessary means less profit for a company. (*) yes 1700 installs could be done for that in optimum circumstances. It could also be much more expensive, all depending. Regards, Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: alternative to voip gateways, (continued)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Colton Conor (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mark Delany (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mark Delany (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 25)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Shawn L via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 02)