nanog mailing list archives
Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:17:55 -0600
On 3/25/20 3:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
some of us still do uucp, over tcp and over pots.
My preference is to do UUCP over SSH (STDIO) over TCP/IP. IMHO the SSH adds security (encryption and more friendly authentication (keys / certs / Kerberos)) and reduces the number of ports that need to be exposed to the world / allowed through the network.
archaic, but still the right tool for some tasks.Yep. Though I think they are few and far in between.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections, (continued)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Rich Kulawiec (Mar 30)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Michael Thomas (Mar 30)
- RE: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Keith Medcalf (Mar 30)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Michael Thomas (Mar 30)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Joe Greco (Mar 30)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Michael Thomas (Mar 30)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Michael Thomas (Mar 30)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Jay Farrell via NANOG (Mar 30)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Rich Kulawiec (Mar 25)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Randy Bush (Mar 25)
- Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 25)