nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google peering in LAX
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:58:45 -0500
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:52 PM Curtis Maurand <cmaurand () xyonet com> wrote:
Google's DNS servers are slow and extra latency makes it worse.
odd, I don't think that's the intent of those dns servers though... did you have a pointer/graph/note about how/where/when you see slowness? there are folk who care about this metric, deeply, and if the service isn't what they expect they can toggle robot arms to get better results.
Current thread:
- Re: Google peering in LAX, (continued)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Seth Mattinen (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Randy Carpenter (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Seth Mattinen (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Seth Mattinen (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Seth Mattinen (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Matthew Petach (Mar 02)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Curtis Maurand (Mar 04)
- Re: Google peering in LAX Christopher Morrow (Mar 04)