nanog mailing list archives
Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:13:48 +0200
On 21/Mar/20 09:09, Pengxiong Zhu wrote:
How do they deliberately congest peering ports? Do you hear from those Chinese operators or you observe this from the traffic?
Simple - let them run at 350% of capacity and pipeline upgrades for Lord knows how long :-). On a serious note, let's have a beer.
Seems like you also think GFW is part of the cause,
I do - each of my trips to China have questioned the role of my VPN for my online experience.
however, we don't have direct evidence.
I won't argue with you there, you did the groundwork. I'm just being anecdotal.
Just curious, What is your "problems"? I thought it's congestion.
Accessibility and penetration rates. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network, (continued)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Matt Corallo (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Tom Paseka via NANOG (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 03)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Frank Habicht (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 21)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 21)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 21)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Ben Cannon (Mar 15)