nanog mailing list archives
Re: 60 ms cross-continent
From: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:04:45 -0400
This was also pitched as one of the killer-apps for the SpaceX Starlink satellite array, particularly for cross-Atlantic and cross-Pacific trading. https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/marketintegrity/2019/06/25/fspacex-is-opening-up-the-next-frontier-for-hft/ "Several commentators quickly caught onto the fact that an extremely expensive network whose main selling point is long-distance, low-latency coverage has a unique chance to fund its growth by addressing the needs of a wealthy market that has a high willingness to pay — high-frequency traders." Regards Marshall On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:01 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo () tzi org> wrote:
On 2020-06-20, at 19:07, Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:This is c in a vacuum. Light transmission through a medium is slower.Ob-movie: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hummingbird_Project Grüße, Carsten
Current thread:
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent, (continued)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Martin Hannigan (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Saku Ytti (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tim Požár (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tony Finch (Jun 21)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Alejandro Acosta (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Joe Hamelin (Jun 22)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Rod Beck (Jun 22)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Carsten Bormann (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Marshall Eubanks (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Rubens Kuhl (Jun 21)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Brett Frankenberger (Jun 21)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Alejandro Acosta (Jun 21)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Rubens Kuhl (Jun 21)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Eric Kuhnke (Jun 21)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Stephen Satchell via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Rod Beck (Jun 22)
- RE: 60 ms cross-continent adamv0025 (Jun 23)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Rod Beck (Jun 23)