nanog mailing list archives
Re: 60 ms cross-continent
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:56:59 +0300
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 20:52, Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org> wrote:
And thus far, no one has mentioned switching speed and other electronic overhead such as the transceivers (that's the big one, IIRC.)
This will be something from tens of meters (low lat swich), to few hundred meters (typical pipeline), to 2km delay (NPU+FAB+NPU) per active IP device. If that is a big one, I guess it depends, cross atlantic, no, inside rack, maybe. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- 60 ms cross-continent William Herrin (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Joe Greco (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tim Požár (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tim Durack (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tim Durack (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Dave Cohen (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Mel Beckman (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Wayne Bouchard (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Saku Ytti (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Bryan Fields (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Martin Hannigan (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Saku Ytti (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tim Durack (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tim Požár (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Joe Greco (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Tony Finch (Jun 21)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Alejandro Acosta (Jun 20)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Joe Hamelin (Jun 22)
- Re: 60 ms cross-continent Rod Beck (Jun 22)