nanog mailing list archives
Re: Router Suggestions
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:26:32 +0200
On 18/Jun/20 00:50, Warren Kumari wrote:
A number of customers (myself included) had 4 hour replacement contracts, which the vendor really could not meet - so we agreed to take a new, much larger/better model as a replacement.
It's one of the reasons we never pay for 24/7/365. In many cases for our experience, with sufficient pre-built redundancy, there isn't much different with 24/7 vs. NBD, apart from the cost. So why pay for the premium. And if a site does not require redundancy, it's cheaper to have a cold standby than to give it 24/7/365, or even NBD. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Router Suggestions, (continued)
- Re: Router Suggestions Baldur Norddahl (Jun 15)
- Re: Router Suggestions Mark Tinka (Jun 16)
- Re: Router Suggestions Owen DeLong (Jun 16)
- Re: Router Suggestions Mark Tinka (Jun 16)
- Re: Router Suggestions Owen DeLong (Jun 16)
- Re: Router Suggestions Mark Tinka (Jun 17)
- Re: Router Suggestions Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: Router Suggestions Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: Router Suggestions Baldur Norddahl (Jun 15)
- Re: Router Suggestions Warren Kumari (Jun 17)
- Re: Router Suggestions Shawn L via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Re: Router Suggestions Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: Router Suggestions Warren Kumari (Jun 18)
- Re: Router Suggestions Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: Router Suggestions Nick Hilliard (Jun 16)
- Re: Router Suggestions Matt Harris (Jun 16)
- Re: Router Suggestions Jared Brown (Jun 16)
- RE: Router Suggestions Luke Guillory (Jun 16)