nanog mailing list archives
Re: LDPv6 Census Check
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:44:11 +0200
On 10/Jun/20 21:36, Phil Bedard wrote:
In its simplest form without TE paths, there isn't much to SRv6. You use a v6 address as an endpoint and a portion of the address to specify a specific VPN service. You completely eliminate the label distribution protocol.
A BGPv6-free core is a decent use-case for us. Much simplicity has been enjoyed by removing that in the IPv4 world. Mark.
Current thread:
- LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Tim Durack (Jun 10)
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti (Jun 10)
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Tim Durack (Jun 10)
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard (Jun 10)
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti (Jun 10)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti (Jun 11)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti (Jun 11)
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti (Jun 10)
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Tim Durack (Jun 10)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Nick Hilliard (Jun 11)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard (Jun 11)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti (Jun 11)
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard (Jun 11)