nanog mailing list archives
Re: ACX5448
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:37:56 +0200
On 8/Jun/20 04:34, Brian Johnson wrote:
I’ve seen horror stories for almost every platform from every vendor over my time. It usually is caused from using the wrong device for the wrong purpose. If you know its limitations, and use it with in the bounds of its capabilities, you will have very few issues with the ACX5448.
For Layer 2 switching, I have no problems with Broadcom at all. Works a treat, and we are super happy with our Arista switch deployments for this. That said, we did run into Jericho issues with egress policing, where the chip runs out of TCAM based on the default EOS profiles. That had to be fixed and tweaked. Thankfully, we don't need large IP ACL's on a switching platform. Mark.
Current thread:
- ACX5448 JASON BOTHE via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: ACX5448 Mark Tinka (Jun 06)
- Re: ACX5448 Bryton Herdes (Jun 06)
- Re: ACX5448 Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: ACX5448 Bryton Herdes (Jun 06)
- Re: ACX5448 Brian Johnson (Jun 08)
- Re: ACX5448 Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: ACX5448 Mark Tinka (Jun 06)