nanog mailing list archives
Re: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers"
From: Fernando Gont <fgont () si6networks com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:23:03 -0300
Hi, Fred, On 29/7/20 05:15, Fred Baker wrote:
Fernando, I asked a specific question, not "send me all of your comments". General discussion of your draft still belongs on the v6ops () ietf org list. Please don't confuse the issue.
Apologies if I may have lead to confusion. I just meant to forward your request, and let folks know what the email alias for the chairs is (sometimes I get it wrong myself e.g. @ietf.org vs. @tools.ietf.org).
I just didn't say "send your support comments" because I didn't want to bias the request.
My apologies, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont () si6networks com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
Current thread:
- Fwd: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" Fernando Gont (Jul 28)
- Re: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" Fred Baker (Jul 29)
- Re: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" Fernando Gont (Jul 29)
- Re: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" Fred Baker (Jul 29)