nanog mailing list archives
Re: 60ms cross continent
From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:48:39 -0700
This is why adaptive coding and modulation systems exist. Also dynamic channel size changes and advanced computationally intensive FECs. You don't think people working on microwave band projects above 10GHz with dollar figures in the hundreds of millions are unaware of basic rain fade and link budget methodology, do you? On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 8:44 PM Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat () nuclearcat com> wrote:
On 2020-07-07 05:04, joe mcguckin wrote:Theoretically, Starlink should be faster cross country than terrestrial fiber. Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications joe () via net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 faxWhen there is no clouds.
Current thread:
- Re: 60ms cross continent joe mcguckin (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent james jones (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Harry McGregor (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Saku Ytti (Jul 07)
- Re: 60ms cross continent j k (Jul 07)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Harry McGregor (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent james jones (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Eric Kuhnke (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Eric Kuhnke (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 06)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Eric Kuhnke (Jul 07)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Mark Tinka (Jul 07)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Eric Kuhnke (Jul 07)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Paul Nash (Jul 08)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 08)
- Re: 60ms cross continent Eric Kuhnke (Jul 06)