nanog mailing list archives
Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16
From: Large Hadron Collider <large.hadron.collider () gmx com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:12:43 +0000
Could not have worded it better myself. On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:30:22 +0000 Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:
Then why are you sending email to nanog () nanog org? LOL! -melOn Jan 29, 2020, at 12:41 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg () tristatelogic com> wrote: I have a standing policy of never attempting to converse with unaccountable anonymized role accounts. Based on past experience, this is without exception an utter waste of my time.
-- Large Hadron Collider <large.hadron.collider () gmx com>
Current thread:
- The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Ronald F. Guilmette (Jan 29)
- Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Sabri Berisha (Jan 29)
- Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Mike Bolitho (Jan 29)
- Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Mel Beckman (Jan 29)
- Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Large Hadron Collider (Jan 30)
- Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Sabri Berisha (Jan 29)