nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual Homed BGP
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:46:55 +0000
It’s pretty pointless for a small ISP to get full routes, because the BGP tables are so highly manipulated. It’s better to just get “company” routes for each upstream, and then use your own traffic engineering via prepending and static or policy routes to balance the outbound traffic the way you like. -mel
On Jan 24, 2020, at 8:40 AM, Brian <brian.bsi () gmail com> wrote: Hello all. I am having a hard time trying to articulate why a Dual Home ISP should have full tables. My understanding has always been that full tables when dual homed allow much more control. Especially in helping to prevent Async routes. Am I crazy?
Current thread:
- Dual Homed BGP Brian (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mel Beckman (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Ben Cannon (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Cummings, Chris (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Ben Cannon (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Job Snijders (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Chriztoffer Hansen (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Amir Herzberg (Jan 27)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Jay Hennigan (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Gavin Henry (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mel Beckman (Jan 24)