nanog mailing list archives
Re: breakout
From: Matt Erculiani <merculiani () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:49:53 -0700
I doubt it applies to Randy's 48 port switch (and maybe in general), but for posterity: be advised that the QSFP28 to SFP+ adapter is physically taller than a standard QSFP28 optic, outside of the device. Inside is still to spec of course. Sort of like how RJ45 SFPs are slightly taller than fiber SFPs, so some switches can't support two rows of them, e.g. Juniper's QFX5100. They CAN fit, but it requires a little persuasion that most people won't be comfortable with. -Matt On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, 12:37 Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
I believe that these (and the AOC option) require that the switch understand / supports splitting the 40G interface into 4x10sarcos does what i expect, sub units as i have no problem wasting ports on the delta box (there are 48 and i only need two :) i think ben's https://www.fs.com/products/72582.html looks to be the simplest solution. thank you all! randy
Current thread:
- breakout Randy Bush (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Ben Cannon (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Randy Bush (Jan 08)
- RE: breakout Luke Guillory (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Warren Kumari (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Randy Bush (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Matt Erculiani (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Warren Kumari (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Ben Cannon (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Matt Erculiani (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Ben Cannon (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Randy Carpenter (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Ben Cannon (Jan 08)
- Re: breakout Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jan 09)
- Re: breakout Baldur Norddahl (Jan 09)
- Re: breakout Olivier Benghozi (Jan 10)
- Re: breakout Baldur Norddahl (Jan 09)