nanog mailing list archives
Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem
From: "Bottiger" <nanog () skial com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:16:29 -0800
I thought you said this on your blog? https://blog.octovpn.com/the-ddos-that-bans-you/ [https://blog.octovpn.com/the-ddos-that-bans-you/] "We are the first VPN on the market to come up with a solution for this, and that's why we are who we are. We're keeping our method completely private for now." Did the method stop working? What was the method? Since you are reselling OVH, you should ask them to block syn-ack spam. it should be trivial for them to block. I would be surprised if it wasn't automatically detected already. Short of bribing Sony, I don't see how you can stop random honey pots from banning spoofed ips. There's no technical solution for that.
Current thread:
- TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Octolus Development (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Forest HQ Has Received Your Message: Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Filip Hruska (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Damian Menscher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Tom Beecher (Feb 21)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Bottiger (Feb 24)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Damian Menscher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Amir Herzberg (Feb 21)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Denys Fedoryshchenko (Feb 21)